The Ego and the Body

Last year I had a serious health scare – nothing serious in the end, but serious enough, for about a month, that I didn't know it would turn out fine. I noticed something during that month that I haven't been able to stop thinking about since: the fear wasn't really about pain, and it wasn't even primarily about dying. It was about disappearing. As if a threat to my body were a direct threat to whatever I meant by 'me.'

You've likely felt some version of this – an illness, an injury, or simply the slow accumulation of aging, watching a body that used to do things effortlessly start needing more care and more patience. Why does a threat to the body register so directly as a threat to the self? The two aren't obviously the same thing. And yet in the moment of fear, they feel identical. No exceptions, in my experience – not for the devout, not for the skeptical, not for anyone.

“(The body) tells the truth whether you’ve given it permission to or not.”

Here is my working answer, built over years of sitting with people in exactly this fear: the ego is not a purely mental construction floating free of the flesh. It is deeply embodied. It lives, quite literally, in sensation – in the tightness in your chest before a hard conversation, in the flush of embarrassment, in the exhaustion of a day spent defending an image. The body is not a house the self merely occupies. It is where the self does a great deal of its actual living, whether you've been taught to notice that or not.

This is why somatic experience –simply feeling what is happening in the body, without immediately interpreting or explaining it –can be such a direct doorway inward. The mind is a skilled editor. It smooths contradictions, tells convenient stories, argues itself out of inconvenient truths. The body is far less cooperative with that project. It knows things the mind would rather not examine, and it tells the truth whether you've given it permission to or not. I've watched articulate, self-possessed people insist through a gritted jaw that they were 'absolutely fine' – the body testifying, in real time, against the very sentence coming out of the mouth.

The traditions have taken very different positions on the body across the centuries, and a few are worth holding side by side. Historic strands of Christian thought sometimes treated the body with suspicion, as a source of temptation to be mastered –which sits oddly alongside the central Christian claim of the Incarnation, that God himself took on a body and called it good. 'The Word became flesh and dwelt among us,' John tells us –not became an idea, not became a moral teaching, but became flesh. That is about as strong an endorsement of embodiment as any tradition has ever offered, and a suspicion of the body has too often crept into Christian practice that the Incarnation itself should have ruled out from the start.

Hindu traditions offer a different account: the physical body, annamaya kosha, is one sheath among several layers of the self – real, and mattering, even as the tradition points beyond it. Buddhist teaching treats close attention to bodily sensation as one of the most direct available paths to seeing the constructed nature of self clearly – nothing to escape, everything to examine. Three quite different theological starting points, converging on the same practical instruction: pay attention to the body. It is not in your way. It is, in a real sense, the way.

Here is where I want you as we move forward: the body is not an obstacle to spiritual practice. It is one of the most immediate and available sites for it. There is nothing more immediate, more constantly available, more honestly yours in this very moment than the breath moving in and out of you right now. Every contemplative tradition I've studied, without exception, eventually arrives at the breath as a starting point –not because it's a clever technique, but because it's the one thing you're always doing, always available, requiring no special equipment or environment. It's already there, waiting for you to notice it, whether or not you ever do.

One practical point I want named directly, because it doesn't get said often enough in spiritual writing: this is also why physical health, in a modest and unfussy way, is a spiritual matter and not merely a wellness-culture add-on. I don't mean the anxious, image-conscious relationship with the body that our culture sells constantly – that's just the ego wearing gym clothes. I mean something simpler: sleep, movement, and rest as ways of respecting the instrument through which all of this inner work actually happens. You cannot hear a whisper over the noise of chronic exhaustion. Tend the body not because it needs to look a certain way, but because it is where you actually live, and a resentful, depleted body will not carry you far into anything real.

I've come to believe the body is a far more honest teacher than most of us give it credit for. Give it five real minutes of attention this week and see what it has to say.

I hope you have a splendid week.  I look forward to continuing our time together in the next issue.  May God enfold you and make his face to shine upon you, this day and always!

P.S. These newsletters form a structured course, designed to be read in
sequence. If this issue arrived out of order, visit the archive to start from the
beginning: insidetheinvisible.com/archive →